Thursday, July 29, 2021

From pilgrimage; make room for the Olive Trees

These are just my thoughts - I’ve not seen any authorized description of it, if it is real.  

When on pilgrimage at Bahji and other places I saw a pattern of how Olive trees are used. So much of the design of things comes from the choices of the Guardian…. Olive trees often seem to represent Manifestations - there are certainly mentions of the idea. Themselves they are very unruly trees - rough bark, angly branches with knobs and twists - and copious in dropping their fruit. In some cases they are amidst other trees like in the case of Bahji where there are two patterns of trees. See  http://www.latitudeimage.com/media/e9165fae-06bc-11e2-8123-7383133f85ed-mansion-of-bahji-and-bahai-shrine-acre The Olive trees are basically round and the Cypress trees are thin and tall. You can see the two patterns. Here’s one showing a line up of Olive trees - http://creationwiki.org/pool/images/d/db/Olive_trees_at_Bahji.jpg  

If you walk the paths you will see these elegant, regal, balanced, Cypress trees framing the white or red graveled walk ways like an honor guard. But then the path comes to an Olive tree - rough, unbalanced, unkempt, olives perhaps littering the ground, demanding attention in the middle of the path. You have to stop and move around it and the path also bumps around it and the Cypress trees with the path, making way for the Olive tree. It seemed a lot of metaphors for the situation of the Manifestations in history to me.  

And the patterns of trees cross - like in foreordained ways you follow the paths of in man’s world and sooner or later but at non-random places and times you are going to come across an Olive tree.  

This picture shows one case of an Olive tree amidst the Cypress - https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgYJ1y0hMEc3TlcpISlSMjL-bBCVYpxQTczbwzZaIgBQpm-7VWnHtVQwe1ey_g50Mt2l-BbhjqyUwiJpZtpKEUU4guDlRyodzrb6Xb8g91jjwKN2iuvbNX3O1YuaMkY-rAglKO6/s1600/3.jpg it is from some years ago and the Cypress trees are young/small.  

I should say there are also other patterns and kinds of trees - the ones closest to Bahji and the one's on the farthest circle around are another I don't know the name of - white bark in sheets. Not Birch exactly - far taller than Birch trees….  

All “said” in a way that is silent and meaningful...

Wednesday, July 28, 2021

On Kahlil Gibran and the Bahá’í Faith

Kahlil was born in Lebanon, which, like Palestine, was a province of Ottoman Turkey control. Lebanon was somewhat disunified by religion but Kahlil's Christian family were friends with Muslims. The Turkish leaders were called Pashas.   

On coming to America, Kahlil's boyhood home was in Boston until about 1900 when he had written enough stories and done enough art to make a living and he moved out on his own to New York where many artists lived; with a trip to Lebanon and another to Paris to strengthen his art. In his writing Kahlil used both Christian and Muslim ideas, a combination sometimes called Sufi which is sometimes its own thing, sometimes a group inside Islam, and sometimes … well it all gets confusing how people see mystical ideas and religious ideas but at the very least the commonality among religions was reflected in Kahlil's ideas and writings. Anyway, he happened to move close to Juliet Thompson who was a Bahá’í by then and Bahá’ís also had an understanding that all the religions were from God. It isn’t exactly the same ideas as Sufis might say but it’s a lot closer to Sufi ideas than to those common among the various religionists of the day who tended to be more separate and think they were better. And Kahlil and Juliet became friends and she often read his writings and they probably showed eachother their drawings and other art pieces. Juliet introduced Kahlil to Bahá’u’lláh’s Writings and later Kahlil called them great.

So in 1912 'Abdu’l-Bahá was coming to America and the way Bahá’ís in America often communicated their ideas about the specifics of who `Abdu’l-Bahá was and Who He was, let alone how the newspapers referred to Him, it would be a common enough idea to say `Abdu’l-Bahá was like the return of Jesus in the flesh and here he was coming to America. Bahá’ís were figuring out speaking opportunities and chances to meet people all across America. Somewhere along the way Kahlil asked if he could have a visit with `Abdu’l-Bahá and draw Him. This idea was approved and the night before Kahlil met `Abdu’l-Bahá, so an entry in a letter to a confidant says, Kahlil could not sleep. Alas we don’t know what went through his mind that night. But the next day indeed they met and Kahlil began a drawing of Him. And they met another day and Gibran worked on the drawing more. But `Abdu’l-Bahá had many meetings and events transpire. In broad strokes, as was pointed out elsewhere on the internet and in books, `Abdu’l-Bahá was a man who had been freed from imprisonment, came to spend time on an island of Manhattan where He gave talks and inspired people with His words and actions. People flocked to meet Him and He was also able to make space to talk with children. And after some months later still in 1912 He was to leave this island of Manhattan and eventually go home. Juliet Thompson herself was very devoted to `Abdu’l-Bahá and often did risky things to be able to watch and serve Him at any occasion, especially on this island. It is also known that Kahlil began working on the ideas for the book The Prophet in 1912.

Most coverage of Kahlil Gibran and the Bahá’í Faith ends there. If you read carefully there are a few more incidents but it becomes a bit unachored in time and place. I’m here to lengthen and specify that background.

In December 1915 Gibran replied to a letter from Thompson receptive to meeting more of her friends including Baha'i Albert Vail, then already known for his great speaking ability and later member of the Race Amity conferences that happened, often partnered with Louis Gregory. We don't know that they met but it is possible - Vail was in Boston 1916 for example.

In 1919 a certain Christian minister attended the unveiling of the Tablets of the Divine Plan in New York. This minister was even on the program to give a talk during the meetings, though alas we don’t know what he said. The talks were generally inspiring Bahá’ís to take these great ideas and calls to action in the Tablets to heart as a something to really take to heart. And here’s this Christian minister on the program. He was not the only Christian minister present but he would have a longer relationship with the Faith - bit different kind of minister one would think. It gets more interesting. Two people were noted members of his church - Kahlil Gibran, who had already begun to share readings drafts of his book, and Mountfort Mills, a Bahá’í and one who in a few years would be elected chairman of the first National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha’is of American and Canada. At the time people were more loose about affiliations, and, again, at the time, the Bahá’ís in New York had no single place or center to go to so Bahá’ís went in directions to meetings as was convenient to them including other Churches. Mountfort Mills went to this a-typical Christian minister’s Church. Where Gibran also went and gave readings of his book as he was working on it. And during the time he began to call it The Prophet. Indeed `Abdu’l-Bahá noted there might be some letters coming that Gibran and the minister should consider publishing more widely. And Gibran himself was also at the 1919 convention and spoke to the group.

In the Spring of 1921 it goes further. In the newspapers there are advertisements of Kahlil Gibran and the Bahá’ís calling a meeting. At this church. To discuss the personal importance of the Prophet in a religion. Alas we don’t know what happened at the meeting but the list of Bahá’ís attending the meeting included Juliet and other very well known Bahá’ís.

In 1922 a Bahá’í traveling teacher sent by 'Abdul-Bahá spoke at this Church more than once.

The Prophet was published in 1923. Kahlil recognition was spreading. Book clubs were reading it, parts were appearing in newspapers, it and he were getting more and more well known. It was approachable and meaningful to people. They loved it. By 1926 annual readings occur at this Church.

In 1928 the Bahá’ís have bought space to have their own Center. And to dedicate the Center they have two elements of the program advertised - a viewing of the one film of `Abdu’l-Bahá that was taken when He was in New York, and comments by Kahlil Gibran. Juliet was there and commented on this but didn’t say when or where this happened. But there’s a newspaper advertisement listing viewing the film and that Kahlil Gibran would be there in 1928. The way Juliet tells the story, from the viewing of the film onward, Kahlil was in tears. When he went on stage he was in tears. When he began to speak he was in tears. He couldn’t get a sentence out. He was overcome, crying. Suddenly he yelled out “I declare `Abdu’l-Bahá the Manifestation of the Age!” and ran from the auditorium weeping. He had used Bahá’í terminology, not Christian or Muslim, and he got it kind of wrong - Bahá’ís don’t see `Abdu’l-Bahá as “the Manifestation of the Age”; that’s Bahá’u’lláh, `Abdu’l-Bahá’s “Manifestation of the Age” and father. But `Abdu’l-Bahá has the station of being the Exemplar, or shall we say the example, of the teachings of His Father (and yes that has a double meaning, at least.) So the mixup is close to home. Plenty close for a non-Bahá’í to get alittle confused.

Also in 1928 Kahlil Gibran published another book - Jesus, the Son of Man - and there is some mention he wrote it thinking of `Abdu’l-Bahá. But it goes further. When WWI ended in the Ottoman retreats and Palestine and Lebanon were freed by force, the Pasha threat to kill `Abdu’l-Bahá failed in their retreat. Where the British took up the protectorate of Palestine the French took it up of Lebanon and then independences of their own began to form, distinctly.

“For some years” before 1932 Bahá’ís continued to hold an observance for the Ascension of 'Abdul-Bahá in St. Mark’s-on-the-Bowerie, the Church of the minister discussed.

From there the story of Kahlil Gibran and the Bahá’í Faith goes silent as far as we know now. He died in early 1931 and he never married though he loved two women and asked both to marry him. It didn’t work out either time, alas, and in truth he didn’t have much more time before he died. 


Now the endnotes including a couple points not covered above:   

* Found by Dr. Hussein Ahdieh circa 2020-1 and saved to archive.org: Kahlil Gibran Autograph Letter Signed, Boston; postmarked December 28, 1915. Addressed to Miss Juliet Thompson. Gibran expresses his delight in making acquaintances with Thompson's friends and wishes her a happy New Year. It reads, in full: "I shall be more than glad to know Albert Vail. Your friends are my friends - even those whome [sicI have not yet known. I wonder how many friends you and I have of whome we know nothing? I know that the new year will bring you blessings - just as well as I know that the heavens will fulfill all the great dreams of your great heart. And may the Salam of Allah be with you always." Accompanied by the letter's original transmittal cover as well as a 4.75" x 7" black and white photograph of Gibran. https://web.archive.org/web/20210907150657/https://historical.ha.com/itm/autographs/authors/kahlil-gibran-autograph-letter-signed-total-2-items-/a/6216-47276.s (and Vail in Boston in 1916 is at https://www.newspapers.com/clip/1119093/albert-r-vail-at-church-society-meeting/ )

* The May 17, 1919 Star of the West notes Rev. Guthrie from St. Marks-in-the-Bouwerie Church on the program for the reception for the national Ridvan Feast, where the Tablets of the Divine Plan were unveiled, April 26. See - http://starofthewest.info/viewer.erb?vol=10&page=55  and  http://starofthewest.info/viewer.erb?vol=10&page=59 

* Gibran's comment is on page 60… "The Convention of Abdul-Baha", by Joseph H. Hannen, Star of the West, eds Albert Windust, Gertrude Buikema, Zia Bagdadi, v10n4, May 17, 1919, p60, see https://bahai.works/index.php?title=File:SW_Volume10.pdf&page=60 

* https://newtopiamagazine.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/the-brothers-guthrie-pagan-christianity-of-the-early-20th-century/ "The Brothers Guthrie: Pagan Christianity of the Early 20th Century", by Kimberly Nichols, Newtopia Magazine, April 16, 2013, notes that in 1919 Kahlil Gibran was appointed to the St. Mark’s Arts Committee and that he read from his yet to be published book The Prophet, “his voice echoing in the small church.” (and) `Abdu’l-Bahá had directed Mills to join the church and was given some leadership in the church.   

* https://books.google.com/books?id=ErhJAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA192&ots=PKh37pJ6sn&pg=PA192, The Message of the East, a Vedanta Monthly, from October, 1921, noted that in 1919 the “distinguished young Arab poet, Kahlil Gibran, first read some of his own poems” at the church.   

* https://bahai.works/Star_of_the_West/Volume_10/Issue_6 see page 110 in a Tablet to Juliet Thompson.

* Gibran's exhibiting at St. Mark's https://www.newspapers.com/clip/4729792/exhibition_by_kahlil_gibran_at_st/ St. Mark's-in-the-Bouwerie…, The Brooklyn Daily Eagle (Brooklyn, New York)8 Nov 1919, Sat • Page 16   

* Newspaper clippings about Kahlil Gibran and the Bahá'ís having a meeting on the importance of the Manifestation at the church:   
- https://www.newspapers.com/clip/4729852/talk_by_kahlil_gibran_with_bahais/  New Thought - Do we need a new world religion to unite the old religions?, The Brooklyn Daily Eagle (Brooklyn, New York)26 Mar 1921, Sat • Page 7 
and in the NY Times  
-> Note the Bahá'í participants - Glenn Shook, Howard McNutt, Horace Holley, Juliet Thompson, Mrs. I. F. Chamberlain, Urbain Ledoux.   

* Sep 1922 Star of the West notes Fazel Mazindirani spoke at St. Marks’s-in-the-Bouwerie more than once - http://starofthewest.info/viewer.erb?vol=14&page=28   

* For the inaugural meeting of the NY Bahá'í Center see:  
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/4753728/viewing_of_abdul_baha_film_with_ahmed/ View Baha’i film, The Brooklyn Daily Eagle (Brooklyn, New York)3 Mar 1928, Sat • Page 3   

* https://www.newspapers.com/clip/4730680/memorial_for_kahlil_gibran/ The Rev. Dr. William Norman Guthrie…, The Brooklyn Daily Eagle (Brooklyn, New York)24 Oct 1931, Sat • Page 11   

* https://www.newspapers.com/clip/4823493/bahai_talks_at_center/ Baha'i Center(advert), The Brooklyn Daily Eagle (Brooklyn, New York)5 Dec 1931, Sat • Page 13 (Rev. Guthrie appears at the Baha’i Center.)

* Bahá'ís had held the Ascension of 'Abdu’l-Bahá commemoration in 1932 “and for some years” at St. Mark’s-in-the-Bouwerie - http://bahai-news.info/viewer.erb?vol=01&page=462   

Prior to this work compiling newspaper clippings the best available information is from:  Bushrui, Suheil B.; Jenkins, Joe (1998). Kahlil Gibran, Man and Poet: a New Biography. Oneworld Publications. ISBN 978-1851682676. Of course there is https://bahai-library.com/thompson_diary Diary of Juliet Thompson by Juliet Thompson and Marzieh Gail, Los Angeles: Kalimat Press, 1983, first written or published 1947. And alittle more recent works include Christopher Buck's “Kahlil Gibran" in American Writers: A Collection of Literary Biographies. Supplement XX in 2010. See: https://www.academia.edu/4332823/_Kahlil_Gibran_American_Writers_Supplement_XX_2010_  which was also translated into Arabic and French, and another work atat https://books.google.com/books?id=2fRoYQSLfL8C&lpg=PA110&ots=V922_UrM5w&pg=PA110 Discovering Imageless Truths; the Bahá'í Pilgrimage of Julieth Thompson, artist, by Christopher G. White, Chapter 4 in American Religious Liberalism, edited by Leigh E. Schmidt, Sally M. Promey, Indiana University Press, Jul 30, 2012, pp. 97–115, see pp. 109-110 and a kernel of some ideas of this note also comes from http://bahaiteachings.org/bahai-influence-on-kahlil-gibrans-the-prophet though it too lacks knowledge of these newspaper clippings (see the comments there.) 

Also please note that Kahlil Gibran may reference some Bahá'í ideas but he also has others - he believed in reincarnation for example. And in the age he wrote, among progressive thinkers, there was some priority to noting women as capable and deserving of note on their own and not solely to be represented by the man of the relationship. Thus he refers to marriage as that of partners and not of the single unity of marriage - these ideas of respecting women and the leadership of women are reflected in Bahá'í teachings and the Bahá'ís have distinguished a remarkable level of achievement promoting women in the Faith and beyond (see among my notes,) Bahá'í marriages emphasis the joining in union rather than in partnership. But given all that I can highly recommend viewing the animated feature The Prophet based on Kahlil Gibran and his book. You would not be far away to picture the antics of Almitra as reminiscent of Juliet, lol, albeit more of her spirit than her age and her concern of course more for 'Abdu'l-Bahá; not that the production company of the video even knew about her.


(Originally on a FB note from June 2016) 

Tuesday, December 15, 2020

 A supreme effort…

Racism has been one of the great banes of this world, and while it is a worldwide phenomenon touching every society internally as well as externally the particulars of its history in the United States of America have been of particular note. To get a grasp of both the world-wide phenomena and the place of these States in the view of the world I recommend reading `Abdu'l-Bahá's 1912 Howard University Speech: A Civil War Myth for interracial Emancipation by Dr. Christopher Buck, part of the commemorative volume, ‘Abdu’l-Bahá’s Journey West - The Course of Human Solidarity, edited by Negar Mottahedeh, available variously.


One angle explored by Dr. Buck in reviewing `Abdu’l-Bahá’s speech calls up the fact, and its image in our hopes and ideals of the function of deeds, that ultimately whites rose up in war to end slavery. As Dr. Buck notes, the Civil War was about slavery but people’s approach to the war evolved, had sides of course, and was driven by slavery’s ubiquitous place in society at the time, and the end of the war marked a major shift in humanity - not the first and not the last in matters of slavery, but an effect of the first order around the world. To the extent the Bahá’í Faith has had something to say about slavery and racism it may be edifying and illuminating to note Bahá’ís in relation to the Civil War and the general American arena of the 19th century and the follow-up and progress of such ideas and practices in the religion. While other situations were presenting themselves on other parts of the 19th century, here is a particular effort to see what comes to light.

The Civil War

Being that the presence of Bahá’í activity in America dates from near 1895 onward, and not a thousand of Bahá’ís until 1899*it is more than remarkable that the one pointed to as the first occidental Bahá’í, and thus not just the first Bahá’í of the United States, or all of America, but of the entire Western Hemisphere, was a veteran of the Civil War. Even more, he was not just a veteran, or one who fought on the Union side, but one who, in the context of the social realities of the day, chose to be a leader of a Colored Troop infantry unit. According to the research of Dr. Robert H. Stockman, James Brown Thornton Chase, or Thornton Chase as he was later universally called, went to Philadelphia to attend a school for officers for black infantry units just before his seventeenth birthday. By May, 1864, Chase was second in charge of one hundred men: Company K of the Twenty sixth United States Colored Troops (USCT). And in July the unit fought two battles south of Charleston, S.C. where Chase was wounded by an exploding cannon and suffered hearing loss in his left ear the rest of his life. In 1865 he was promoted to captain and commanded Company D of the 104th USCT. In time Chase wandered the Colorado mountains looking for silver and eventually got a job in life insurance and then in the summer of 1895 learned of the Bahá’í Faith. He died in 1912 after having traveled far east and west in the country, steadily serving the new religion, and `Abdu’l-Bahá offered a prayer for him, saying in part “Verily he held the chalice of guidance in his right hand and gave unto those athirst to drink of the cup of favor.”


While we know the most about Chase’ Civil War service among all Bahá’ís, he is not the only veteran who came to the Faith. Another we know some about was Nathan Ward Fitzgerald. While Chase had his own complicated history, Fitzgerald and others of his family served in Indiana-based infantries, and after the war became involved in the government’s pensions system, fell to the political intrigues of the day, and eventually was despondent of all things until he was galvanized by the Bahá’í Faith. It dug deep into his roots recalling his mother’s fervor as a Millerite. Despite being somewhat untutored in the teachings of the religion his enthusiasm and skills as an orator lead to the establishment of the Faith in America’s north west.


John Wilson Gift, the first Bahá’í of Peoria, ended the Civil War as a Captain of Company F of the 13th Regiment of the Iowa Volunteer Infantry* that was captured along with many others during the surprise attack of the Confederates Apr 6, 1862. Gift survived and worked the rest of his life in bigger and bigger mill companies and moved between Iowa, Missouri, and ended up in Peoria Illinois from 1880* and became the first Baha'i there in 1915.* Albert Vail was beginning to make waves promoting the Bahá’í Faith and came to Peoria and meet Gift. Gift married Maye Harvey - more about her below - in 1918 and they received a brief tablet from `Abdu’l-Bahá in 1919 saying in part “Ye strive for the guidance of souls and become the cause of the illumination of hearts… From among these is the establishment of one’s remembrance and the attainment unto the supreme bounty in the Abha Kingdom.”* He died in 1927.


But we know of a few more Civil War veterans who found the Bahá’í Faith. John C. Ruddiman was also among the first wave of Bahá’ís in the United States going through the same kind of classes on the religion Thornton Chase went through and, also like Chase, served in the Civil War out of New York though when he come to the religion he and his wife were living in Kansas. Oscar S. Hinckley was a Civil War veteran who had also been injured in the war. He was disabled and living on a government pension and served on the precursor to the local Spiritual Assembly in Chicago from January 1902 until September 1906. Another who founded the Bahá’í community of Buffalo, NY, was John Harrison Mills who attracted `Abdu’l-Bahá to Buffalo. There was also Archie C. Fisk (about whom research is presently ongoing but he served with the lieutenant of companies K & E of the Ohio 23rd Regiment Infantry and rose to being an adjunct officer of several Union Generals and retiring as a colonel and was a Bahá'í by 1899.) According to the research of O.Z. Whitehead in Some Baha'is to Remember, p. 1, another early Bahá’í, Arthur Pillsbury Dodge, served in the Civil War as a drummer boy in the regiment from New Hampshire under the command of his father, Colonel Simon Dodge.


So more than one Civil War veteran founded Bahá'í communities. Thornton Chase served with a particular distinction. Archie Fisk may have been the highest ranking Civil War veteran to join the religion because he served on the staff of several generals. If we find more veterans we will be pushing the average of veterans that joined the religion. Around 1900 there were some 76 million Americans. That means Bahá’ís were around 0.001% of the American population. About 1 million veterans of the Civil War were living in 1900.* That means roughly 10 veterans would randomly would have found the Faith - and we know of most of them perhaps. A rough estimate of whites who served in black units is about 5-600. Only some of them served in two units and only some of them would have been alive circa 1900. The fact that Chase was one of them and was the first Bahá’í in the West seems out of proportion with chance.


Beyond those who were themselves were in the Civil War and joined the religion, there are those who had family directly related to the issues and realities of the Civil War. Perhaps earliest is Sarah Farmer who found the Faith in 1900. According to the research of Anne Gordon Perry in her Green Acre on the Piscataqua, Farmer’s mother, Hannah Tobey Shapleigh Farmer, (1823-1991), was an abolitionist. Farmer saw to it that Green Acre hosted a meeting of Civil War vets in 1906.* We also have the case of We also have the case of Julius deLagnel, whose second wife Josephine Conkin Cowles deLagnel was an early Bahá’í and had arranged for `Abdu'l-Bahá to visit Julius’ grave during 1912. A decade earlier Josephine hosted Ali Kuli Khan when he first came to the States.* Eva Webster Russell was an early Bahá’í close to Frederick Douglass. Agnes Parsons' father was a Civil War general whose gravesite `Abdu’l-Bahá also visited, in Arlington Cemetery.* Claudia Coles' father was a Civil War vet; see Portraits of Some Baha'i Women by OZ Whitehead, p. 37. Elizabeth Carpenter's father served in the Civil War, see Why they became Baha'is, by Annamarie Honnold, p. 305. Florence Mayberry's father served in the Civil War - she tells an anecdote in her autobiography: "…the whole family moved to Waverly Missouri. The family became friends several African-Americans: Ollie, a neighboring African-American, and insisted an African-American family eat with them at their kitchen table. There was a "visit" from the social ladies of the town who communicated to them that the norm in the area was in favor of maintaining segregated eating - and her grandfather quipped back, as Mayberry recalled, 'Tell your menfolks this. As a boy I fought in the Civil War for Abe Lincoln. The idea was to fix things so black folks are free to be like God wanted 'em to be. Free and equal. A colored man or woman is as good as Becky'n me. In my house they eat at my table, because I eat at my table. And tell your menfolks this, too. I keep a loaded shotgun under my bed. And the first man, or men, steps on my land I bought and paid for to force me or my woman to change how we treat folks on our property will get its full blast. And I reload fast. I thank you, Ladies, and good afternoon.' "

Beyond war

But just as peace is not defined or created by the absence of war, so too unity is not well characterized by a war that eventually promulgated the end of slavery. While there are various reviews of early connections of the Faith with Africans and African Americans, this is primarily a review of what “white” American Bahá’ís have done on matters of racial healing. I hope you have already seen several links to materials to read - more to come! Beyond those of individual efforts to follow, below, there is the case of the series of conferences Bahá’ís organized called "Race Amity Convention"s. These have been commented on in various places, (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) but there has yet to be a collective review. While Louis Gregory and Agnes Parsons were key founding participants, many others contributed in leading events or participating in talks. Most especially this was true of Albert Vail, (though some of this remains to be documented - some further links after 1921 are known *,*,*.) A moving speaker by Gregory’s own testimony, he participated in most Race Amity Conventions. Across some 15 years from 1921 to 1936, with sometimes more than one conference per year, usually held across more than one day in more than one venue, perhaps dozens of speakers and panelists ultimately took part. And these ran well into the Great Depression. The conventions were succeeded with more locally presented Race Unity conferences.) A moving speaker by Gregory’s own testimony, he participated in most Race Amity Conventions. Across some 15 years from 1921 to 1936, with sometimes more than one conference per year, usually held across more than one day in more than one venue, perhaps dozens of speakers and panelists ultimately took part. And these ran well into the Great Depression. The conventions were succeeded with more locally presented Race Unity conferences, and then Race Unity Day which is still observed. Even so, integration was a process repeated which is still observed. Even so, integration was a process repeated over and over, rising to become the national norm.* Bahá’ís were also involved in the NAACP and other race-conscious organizations.*


The religion itself is organized primarily around elected institutions such that no one runs for office and, instead, everyone votes only as their conscience dictates, respecting only the qualities of the spirit each sees through their own eyes among their fellow believers. As a result, the Faith abides no quotas perse, though tie votes are yielded to the minority in the society in question. It is in this situation where the Bahá’ís of the United States have, since 1922, almost always elected at least one African American to the national assembly, and usually two, sometimes 3 or 4. An average of 17% African American have been elected any particular year. Of the 78 Bahá’ís who have been elected to the National Spiritual Assembly annually since 1922, 15 (19%) have been African-American* whereas the average in the US Congress is approaching 10% although not actually reaching it.* Nevertheless, in 1939, Shoghi Effendi, then head of the religion, said: “Let the white make a supreme effort in their resolve to contribute their share to the solution of this problem, to abandon once for all their usually inherent and at times subconscious sense of superiority, to correct their tendency towards revealing a patronizing attitude towards the members of the other race, to persuade them through their intimate, spontaneous and informal association with them of the genuineness of their friendship and the sincerity of their intentions, and to master their impatience of any lack of responsiveness on the part of a people who have received, for so long a period, such grievous and slow-healing wounds.” (See also this.)

Stories

So, a testimony continues though it may be drowned out by the narrative of suffering in the United States most of the time. Some stories have been gathered, some less so. Pauline Hannen’s story less so, so far, (but see here though she and her husband taught the religion to Louis Gregory, a very well-known Bahá’í.) In the 1920s Bahá’í engagement in New York city,* a location of hundreds of Bahá’ís but without a Center of their own, became distinguished both among those recognizing the evil of racism and among those who supported it. The favorable comment was “…resulting in the formation of important Bahá'í centres in New York, Chicago, San Francisco and other cities. One of the most notable practical results of the Bahá'í ethical teaching in the United States has been, according to the recent testimony of an impartial and qualified observer, the establishment in Bahá'í circles in New York of a real fraternity between black and white, and an unprecedented lifting of the "colour bar", described by the said observer as ‘almost miraculous’.” But from a recognized newspaper associated with the KKK we have: “In several cities meetings are regularly held by Bahaists (sic) and Babist (sic) … in New York.” Though an Austrian and fleeing WWI, Ludmila O. B. Van Sombeek was visible in black newspapers for decades in America because of her personal and energetic participation in matters of African-Americans and interracial harmony at first alittle since the late 1920s but then much more in the 1950s and 60s. Robert B. Powers was a kind of state-wide police chief in California in 1945 and in 1946 was brought to a process to develop an early police training program geared to overcome assumptions of racism rampant among police and society and simultaneously began to read books on the Faith. Later his son joined a police force but when he witnessed undue violence this son testified against the police. Dorothy Beecher Baker helped develop a speaker’s bureau for race matters. More stories await documenting. Workers in the field of unity walked the paths of bringing people together.* Our predilection for inter-racial meetings has gotten us in trouble even in more recent days.*


While `Abdu’l-Bahá often spoke to the issue of race, and Bahá’u’lláh had freed the slaves inherited from his wealthy father, a noble in a society that also practiced slavery acquiring African slaves from its east coast compared the Europeans and US doing so in the west coast, Bahá’ís had not collected a compilation of the guidance presented in various circumstances until circa 1935. Two white women - Maye Harvey Gift and Alice Simmons Cox - did this. They both joined the religion in the Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, community. Gift had graduated from the University of Illinois there, took up the early days of philanthropy work, and got professional training and on return to Urbana she worked through several organizations ultimately becoming the director of the Pekin Social Service League in a neighboring town. She encountered the Bahá’í Faith about 1915 as did her soon husband and Civil War veteran John Wilson Gift and among their first acts as a couple was supporting soldiers in WWI through a university support system for veterans. Cox was from a small town in Illinois and attended Lombard College where she graduated summa cum laude and had David Starr Jordan as a faculty member. She married Levi Cox on graduating and the couple moved to Peoria. Cox encountered the Faith by 1934. Gift had attended the earliest meetings of the new Louhelen Bahá’í School in Michigan and began her service there with three presentations on race issues to eager adult learners of the religion. Cox learned of the work and together they decided to produce a compilation the first version of which came out in 1935. Cox worked as a writer and editor of World Order magazine. In anticipation of the Centenary of the Declaration of the Báb in 1844 the Bahá’í community choose race issues as one of the lead projects to be promulgated and Gift and Cox returned to their compilation, revising and extending it - a list of references was published in World Order in 1942 as “Bahá'í Lessons” and the revised text Race and Man was published in 1943 - a year fraught with race riots in the US. During that period from November 1942 to April 1943 Cox wrote articles for the New York Age and Pittsburg Courier - two of the most prominent African American newspapers in the country - outlining the Bahá’í view on matters of race and social justice. The compilation was republished in 1946 and again in 1956. That edition eventually made it into the library of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Gift died in 1961 and Cox near 1985.


However, in that period from mid-1930s the attention of many Bahá’ís was directed overseas. In the face of being purged from southern Russia under the Soviet Union, the religion, and significantly the body of the Bahá’ís of the United States, were directed to promote the religion in South America, and then Europe, and then Africa by individuals choosing to live in foreign lands.* This was initiated in the latter days of the colonial period around the world and America was engaging on the world stage itself and promoting a hegemony. However, the Bahá’ís were directed and guided in specific ways and with specific goals to avoid any tendency of cultural colonialism and its baggage of racism. Multiplying institutional capacity across Latin America was specifically minded in such a way as to facilitate a shift in the balance of roles from Americans giving leadership guidance and Latino cooperation to Latinos leading and giving guidance and Americans cooperating.* When Americans went to Africa, care was minded repeatedly that the goal was to empower African adoption of the religion and leadership in locally implementing the religion among those that wanted to join it.* When the religion was brought to the attention of Native Americans, the lack of colonialization mindsets was observed by non-Bahá’í native scholars.* When the religion arrived in New Guinea, indigenous converts became known as the ones who preserved and advanced traditional knowledge.*  When the Bahá’ís sought to promote village radio programs across Latin America it was in a context of developing locally sustainable skills as well as a distinction in promoting indigenous languages.* Indeed, following the founding and advancing of the community by white American Bahá’ís,*,*,* in 1997 Bahá’ís contributed to the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission as follows: “…both individual Bahá'ís and our administrative institutions were continually watched by the security police.... Our activities did not include opposition to the previous Government for involvement in partisan politics and opposition to government are explicitly prohibited by the sacred Texts of our Faith.... During the time when the previous Government prohibited integration within our communities, rather than divide into separate administrative structures for each population group, we opted to limit membership of the Bahá'í Administration to the black adherents who were and remain in the majority of our membership and thereby placed the entire Bahá'í community under the stewardship of its black membership.... The pursuit of our objectives of unity and equality has not been without costs. The 'white' Bahá'ís were often ostracized by their white neighbours for their association with 'non-whites'. The Black Bahá'ís were subjected to scorn by their black compatriots for their lack of political action and their complete integration with their white Bahá'í brethren.…”


Though phases of activity were overseas there was some activity back in the States. In December 1947 Bahá’ís participated in a protest at the University of Chicago and echoes of the student protestors were published around the United States,*,*,*,*,*. This was over how black students were being treated in medical institutions on campus.* The question of participation in the protest was addressed to the leader of the religion after `Abdu’l-Bahá - Shoghi Effendi - by a leading black Bahá’í. He got a reply in January 1948 in support of the general and specific protest by Bahá’ís because of the general outrage in the society on campus and an awareness in that society of the Bahá’í views on race and justice.*


Having finished the 10 Year Crusade around the world, back in the US in 1964 Bahá’ís took part in an initiative similar to the Freedom Summer campaign with connections at the Louhelen Bahá'í School, and the burgeoning Bahá'í community of Greenville, South Carolina, which was integrating its schools that Fall. Training sessions for a project were noted in the Bahá'í News in August.* Some 80 youth attended the training in mid-June with faculty like Firuz Kazemzadeh. After the classes in various subjects, 27 individuals went to 8 locations including Greenville, SC.* Six youth including some white students went to Greenville under the sponsorship of the local assembly there for a 6 week program. Local youth joined in. The group worked on tutoring some 55 black students about to attend newly integrating schools, held informational meetings on the religion, and supported petitioning for the public swimming pool being integrated. The work was capped with a parent-teacher banquet reception at a church and a picnic for the students conducted by the Bahá'í teachers.* The group visited many churches, restaurants, parks, stores, and a community center to demonstrate solidarity with the black community. Side ventures included the Bahá'í Summer School near Asheville, NC, going to Greensboro, NC, and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference training camp near Savannah, GA.


In the mid-later 1960s a particular hotspot in American society was the situation in Montgomery, Alabama. A startup newspaper dedicated to coverage of events was the Southern Courier and it covered some Bahá’í mentions as well.* Before it started printing in July it should be noted Bahá'ís participated in the (probably third) March on Montgomery and arranged for telegrams according to the June issue of Baha'i News.* The National Assembly telegrammed the US President and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Bahá'ís that marched include Henry Miller, Diane Schable, Daniel Connor, Charles Carter, Mary Jane Austin, Joseph Mydell, Joan Bronson (the last two from Montgomery.) Though Bahá’ís had lived there in the 1930s, however, as of 1954 there were no known Bahá'ís in Montgomery.


By the 1980s it was clear that the Bahá'í Faith had progressed around the nation and it was possible to look at relatively how it had done over the previous decades.* Certainly there were intensional programs to spread the religion as well as to keep spreading it rather than form concentrations. But interestingly it seems that to a first approximation one region stood out as relatively underperforming in the spread of the religion - the South, where over and over again the teachings of the religion had to be applied against a context of the Jim Crow laws and white supremacy culture of the region, only recently pushed back to a degree by the Civil Rights Movement. And to a second degree of approximation, the most progress of the religion in the South was among the black populations mostly along the coasts of the South.


There are probably other instances - this is what has been gathered so far.


So, there are diverse measures of white Bahá’ís making an effort to live in distinctive ways as they adopted the religion and promoted standards of integration and respect for diversity. And Bahá’ís have succeeded in demonstrable ways decades before the contests general American culture went through for civil rights and, despite changes in law and society, have yet to achieve. This isn’t to say that cultural norms among white Bahá’ís are done evolving and there is comment of a need for a sustained and ubiquitous progression in the face of the pernicious effects of racism. As membership in the religion is within a racist society in America, there are affects inward as well as outward. We’re not done.

Tuesday, February 09, 2016

It was in the news…


"Sublime meteoric shower all over the United states - 1833" from The National Memorial Volume: Being a Popular Descriptive Portraiture of the Great Events of Our Past Century

This is a presentation that is going to review the newspaper coverage of the Baha'i Faith and is going to review it in light of the kind of news-of-the-day early Christianity had. This is for two reasons - first though the spiritual teachings are attractive and heart-felt the history is very tense. One may think a religious Founder comes and everyone just believes but history says it is not so. And second, the parallels between early Christianity - even Jesus Himself - and early Baha'i history are inescapable and have been made by those inside the religion as well as some outside. Here we will see it for ourselves. The early history of Christianity as noted in the Gospels should be well known before this at least in general (things like the manger, baptism, crucifixion, apostles suffering and basically the progress of the growth of the religion) - but what is often less well known is how others at the times noted these events. There are various quotes either from history or from published works. This compilation and my words, outside of the quotes, have no authority within or outside the Baha'i Faith. These are just for your consideration.

 So first we have the analysis of a Baha'i authority making the parallel…
"It would indeed be no exaggeration to say that nowhere in the whole compass of the world’s religious literature, except in the Gospels, do we find any record relating to the death of any of the religion-founders of the past comparable to the martyrdom suffered by the Prophet of Shíráz. … The passion of Jesus Christ, and indeed His whole public ministry, alone offer a parallel to the Mission and death of the Báb, a parallel which no student of comparative religion can fail to perceive or ignore. In the youthfulness and meekness of the Inaugurator of the Bábí Dispensation; in the extreme brevity and turbulence of His public ministry; in the dramatic swiftness with which that ministry moved towards its climax; in the apostolic order which He instituted, and the primacy which He conferred on one of its members; in the boldness of His challenge to the time-honored conventions, rites and laws which had been woven into the fabric of the religion He Himself had been born into; in the rôle which an officially recognized and firmly entrenched religious hierarchy played as chief instigator of the outrages which He was made to suffer; in the indignities heaped upon Him; in the suddenness of His arrest; in the interrogation to which He was subjected; in the derision poured, and the scourging inflicted, upon Him; in the public affront He sustained; and, finally, in His ignominious suspension before the gaze of a hostile multitude—in all these we cannot fail to discern a remarkable similarity to the distinguishing features of the career of Jesus Christ.”
 - God Passes By, by Shoghi Effendi, 1979, p. 56, (paragraph 15)
Now these are names you may not have heard as much - the Bab and the Babi Dispensation and Shiraz. You may have heard Baha'is note the year 1844 as the origin of the history of the Baha'i Faith. Indeed the 1800s had many astounding events like the 1833 meteor storm.

Baha'is see a relationship akin to John the Baptist and Jesus between the persons of the Bab and Baha'u'llah - a subject we'll return to another time. From the Christian narratives we know John the Baptist was out moving the people to repent and be baptized to outwardly and inwardly refine their lives with a personal commitment to a new life. So the history of the Baha'i Faith begins with the history of the Bab and here we see a remarkable case being made - that the history of the Bab and of Jesus are extremely parallel. But again what was the view of the people of the day on the coming of Jesus? We all kind of know the Biblical story but what were people talking about outside the Bible? A historian of the period concerned with Jewish history is known as Josephus - we know almost nothing about where Josephus got his information but it was clearly second or third hand at best and clearly the color of the coverage was unfriendly. He has three references to these early matters. This is taken from the Wikipedia article "Josephus on Jesus":
"And now Caesar, upon hearing the death of Festus, sent Albinus into Judea, as procurator. … Albinus was but upon the road; so he assembled the sanhedrin of judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others; and when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned.
Now some of the Jews thought that the destruction of Herod's army came from God, and that very justly, as a punishment of what he did against John, that was called the Baptist: for Herod slew him, who was a good man... Herod, who feared lest the great influence John had over the people might put it into his power and inclination to raise a rebellion... Accordingly he was sent a prisoner, out of Herod's suspicious temper, to Macherus, the castle I before mentioned, and was there put to death.
Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man; for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.”
The third is in some dispute among scholars who broadly think there was some kernel of truth that got changed a bit. But I'll let it stand. Here we have a very different angle on what we we've come to know of the history of Christianity. There's no manger, no wise men, no gathering of apostles. First we hear of things because Jesus' brother James got in trouble and then John the Baptist and finally Jesus were all put to death. The chronology is out of the familiar order not to mention a whole different slant. And this is not the cozy realm of spiritual thought and ideals. This is the hardness of human hearts - of intolerance of unconventionally, of politics and traditions and fears. And people were stoned to death and hung on a cross.

Josephus wrote about 30 or 50 years after the events of the Gospels. This is the considered thought of a historian. And it gets worse. The historian Tacitus writes another 20 odd years after Josephus about more news of Christians now almost a century after Jesus. This is from the Wikipedia article "Tacitus on Christ".
"But all human efforts, all the lavish gifts of the emperor, and the propitiations of the gods, did not banish the sinister belief that the conflagration was the result of an order. Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired. Nero offered his gardens for the spectacle, and was exhibiting a show in the circus, while he mingled with the people in the dress of a charioteer or stood aloft on a car. Hence, even for criminals who deserved extreme and exemplary punishment, there arose a feeling of compassion; for it was not, as it seemed, for the public good, but to glut one man's cruelty, that they were being destroyed.”
Harrowing. Very harrowing. Something happened - a fire - some plead guilty, and then Christians who had nothing to do with it were rounded up and killed in very heinous ways. It can even be argued they were entirely innocent. Notice Tacitus thinks the Christians culpable for being so different - but it is "lamentable" they had to be put to death this way.

There are a few more quotes from the first century or so of the Christian history. But I don't wish to prolong this over much. These are the key quotes about how things were viewed from the outside so to speak. This is a broad picture of the history it is contended is a parallel for looking at the early history of the Baha'i Faith and its basis in the Babi Faith.

And O yes, there is a record of a quake after Jesus was crucified. It was symbolic but it was also physical. Not much is known of it, but earthquakes are not fun to go through. Recall the quake in Haiti was very terrible even though stronger quakes had hit California where few died whereas in Haiti it was very terrible. This also, we will see, happened in the history of the Bab.

Here's the quote on a quake after Jesus' martyrdom - "[…sediments in the Dead Sea] … reveal a seismic event that happened sometime between the years 26 and 36.”

So, like the Christians starting with the notable Origen who observed Josephus' writing near two centuries later, Baha'is didn't rely on historians and reporters - we have our own narratives and chroniclers who wrote our own records. So coming to hear of the non-Baha'i comments took some time to find, to discover they even existed, and here we are near two centuries later. Just as it wasn't until many years later that Josephus was noted by Christians.

We speak of things in the 1800s but it wasn't until the 1970s that newspaper stories referring to the first public events of Babi history come to our own eyes. And the hint of the trail is noted in 1973 by Hasan Balyuzi who published the biography, The Báb: The Herald of the Day of Days. It is a newspaper clipping with the title "Mahometan Schism" - referring to Muhammad, peace be upon Him, and already you see a sense of division and strife being referred to by One whom we call meek and gentle. And that trail led back to earlier and earlier dates - from America in 1846 back to Nov 15 1845 and then finally to Nov 1, 1845 in London as the first public event of the religion that makes the news- a paper was published in 1976 when this was finally identified - "Persia": An Early Mention of the Báb, by Robert Cadwalader, in World Order magazine, Winter 1976-77, pp. 30-34.

This was further summarized in 1981 in Moojan Momen's book. "The Bábí and Bahá'í religions 1844-1944: some contemporary western accounts" published in 1981, ISBN 978-0-85398-102-2. For the careful researcher this is an excellent review of the material as it was known circa 1980.

Recall James got in trouble and was stoned? That happened way later compared to the Gospel narrative. So the earliest moments of the Baha'i narrative for Babi history begin much earlier and are private events. In May a man left his school, wandered in search of a promised one, came to a city gate and was welcomed to take rest in the home of the Bab. That night there was intense discussion and hearts won to a Cause of enlightenment and fulfillment - yet there was no reporter present, no historian, no anthropologist. Just as Jesus walked into the River Jordan and no one really took note so it was with the first moments of the Babi Faith. These events we are to hear about in the news come later.

18 individuals each independently and quietly, personally, even in dreams, came to affirm specifically that the Bab was their promised one. Only then did He give them their first missions. One He sent out to tell the students at the school that the promised one had come. Another He sent north to look for a hidden secret and found a family man who would later be called Baha'u'llah. But the Bab Himself - and the lead disciple Quddus as he was later known - went off on pilgrimage to Mecca and there proclaim the new Day. But none of these are matters western reporters would be interested in. Recall this was a time of colonies and empires - British, Spanish, Portuguese, Danish colonies were spread through the world. Russia was pushing out too - so in Persia we had Russia pushing down from the north and the British pushing in from the south and east. Shiraz is the city of the Bab and it located in the south. And colonies are about trade flowing. The Boston Tea Party was about trade fairness and that's the kind of thing that makes the news to the British concerns - threats to trade. So the first coverage of the Babi history is to come soon. The Bab and Quddus return from Mecca, land at the port city near Shiraz and the Bab sends Quddus and a few others already converted on to Shiraz to make the news in His hometown.

 So here's one of the versions of that first newspaper story:
"We have been favored with the following letter, dated Bushire, August 10: A Persian merchant, who has lately returned from a pilgrimage to Mecca, had been for some time endeavoring here to prove that he was one of the successors of Mahomet, and there had a right to demand of all true Mussulmans to mention him as such in their profession of faith; he had already collected a good number of followers, who secretly aided him in forwarding his views. On the evening of the 23d of June last, I have been informed from a creditable source, four persons being heard at Shiraz repeating their profession of faith according to the form prescribed by the new impostor were apprehended, tried, and found guilty of unpardonable blasphemy. They were sentence to lose their beards by fire being set to them. The sentence was put into execution with all the zeal and fanaticism becoming a true believer in Mahomet. Not deeming the loss of beards a sufficient punishment for the believers in the impostor, they were further sentenced on the next day to have their faces blacked and exposed throughout the city. Each of them was led by a Mirgazah (executioner), who had made a hole in his nose and passed through it a string, which he sometimes pulled with such violence that the unfortunate fellows cried out alternatively for mercy from the executioner and for vengeance from Heaven. It is custom in Persia on such occasions for the executioners to collect from the spectators, and particularly from the shopkeepers in the bazaar. In the evening, when the pockets of the executioners were well filled with money, they led the unfortunate fellows to the city gate, and there told them:
"The world was all before them where to choose
Their place of rest, and Providence their guide."
After which the Mollahs at Shiraz sent men to Bushire with power to seize the impostor, and take him to Shiraz, where, on being tried, he very wisely denied the charge of apostasy laid against him, and thus escaped from punishment."
You can find this newspaper clipping archived at http://bahai-library.com/first_newspaper_accounts_babism

It turns out there are actually many echoes of this first newspaper story in fact. Here's a list - just skim to get a sense of it:
1845
1 Nov, London Times
6 Nov, Bradford Observer
15 Nov, Literary Gazette and Journal of the Belles, Letters, Arts, Sciences, etc., London, England
18 Nov, Morning Post
19 Nov, London Times and London Standard
20 Nov, Patriot of London
21 Nov, Stamford Mercury, Lincolnshire, England, and Newcastle Courant, Tyne and Wear, England
22 Nov, Leamington Spa Courier, Warwickshire, England
25 Nov, Kentish Gazette, Kent, England and Freeman's Journal Dublin, Republic of Ireland
26 Nov, Blackburn Standard, Lancashire, England, Hereford Journal, Herefordshire, England
27 Nov, Fife Herald, Fife, Scotland
28 Nov, Royal Cornwall Gazette, Cornwall, England
29 Nov, West Kent Guardian, West Yorkshire, England, Northern Star, Hereford Times, Herefordshire, England, Sherborne Mercury, Dorset, England, Western Times, Devon, England, Northern Star and National Trades Journal
5 Dec, Liverpool Mercury, Merseyside, England
1846
5 Jan, Caledonian Mercury, Midlothian, Scotland
6 Jan, Dundee Courier, Angus, Scotland
14 Jan, Dumfries and Galloway Standard, Dumfriesshire, Scotland
26 Jan, Troy Daily Whig, Troy NY
30 Jan, Christian observer of Louisville, Kentucky
19 Feb, Vermont Watchman and State Journal, Montpelier, Vermont
23 Feb, Signal of Liberty, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Feb (Jan/Feb issue) The Eclectic Magazine of Foreign Literature, Science, and Art (New York, NY)
31 Mar, Melbourne Australia's Port Phillip Herald
4 Apr, Boon's Lick Times, Fayette, Missouri, p. 1, Morning Chronicle, Sydney, Australia, p. 4  7 Apr, South Australian, Adelaide, Australia
11 Apr, South Australian Register, Adelaide, Australia
15 July, New Zealand Spectator Cook's Strait Guardian

And - get this - I'm absolutely sure this is an incomplete list! England... England... England... and then 27 November we have Ireland…Scotland... on it goes... under 1846 we have New York, Troy New York, Louisville Kentucky, Montpelier Vermont, Ann Arbor Michigan, here's Fayette Missouri - and Sydney Australia! And then down to New Zealand!   (Now here we are in the online "world"/"country?" of Blogger! lol) Echoes of this newspaper article have been found in almost every country on the planet that had an English language newspaper in the day. Britain, the US, Australia and New Zealand are confirmed. We hope to find it yet in Canada and other places; maybe even in other languages. All these are footnoted (though some depend on a subscription to a newspaper clipping service.) The link to go to is at http://bahaikipedia.org/%22Persia_-_or_-_Mahometan_Schism%22

So after the events in Shiraz the Bab was arrested, accused of things He didn't claim and punished - well you get the picture. Punishment just because He was challenging a cardinal rule of Islam which others thought was a prophetic day, the rule of clerical order of the day, and who were founded with a promise that one day a One unlike any other would come and were warned the day would be tough. From Shiraz the Bab was sent away and He then directed His followers to spread to different directions. Here we have a newspaper story from 1848. Two years have gone by. Here you see reports He has gathered some 30,000 converts and the Bab has again been arrested. Recall the news of Jesus - He was accused of idolatry and sorcery. What sorcery was that? People would meet Him and be magnetized to a whole different approach to life even if they were scholars or fixed on denying Him many were converted or dumbfounded. People not there see this and develop fear and loathing. Here we have a supposed confession under torture. Recall the judges accusing Jesus and bating Him with questions. Non-Baha'is noted this later. All this can be read in the histories but here - June 1848 - we have a letter from May being printed in French in the Journal de Constantinople of a letter from Persia.

In June 1848 a letter from May 1 is summarized and printed in the Journal de Constantinople
"…from Persia, dated May 1st from Teheran,…
… encouraging the supporters of the Bab in their resistance to religious authorities of the country. The Bab is a madman who has announced himself in Persia, some time ago, to be the Mahdi (Messiah), and by his preaching in Azerbaijan and Gilan, he has succeeded in gathering around him about 30,000 converts. The royal prince named last governor of Tabríz, having been able, by persuasion, to get (p. 2) the Bab to confess his imposture. The latter has been thrown into a dungeon, after having previously been subjected to torture, in accordance with the laws of the country.… "- http://bahaikipedia.org/%22name_of_Bab%22
The only part mentioning the details is a short bit in a longer story but you get the sense of things and the mixed attitudes.

Next (from the same url)
"This was written to us from Tabríz on the 1st of March, 1849:We have been talking for some time of a religious sect who took up arms in Mazenderan to defend its dogmas and its leader who is currently in jail there. Babis, so named after their leader, profess some very advanced socialist ideas. They are also furious as one can imagine, and they are already worn to excesses against delegated power. Now that the government seems completely delivered of embarrassment by Khorasan, it probably will reduce them."
Here we have Babis who had been a threat to the public order by converting 10s of thousands of people in many cities in just three years to change religions, to set aside previous understanding, to live according to different rules and here they are called "very advanced socialist ideas". Mazanderan(various spellings in these newspaper clips) is a province in Persia. This hint of taking up arms... let's read the next one:
29 March, 1849
"I have seen it announced that the Bab, after his rebellion and imprisonment in Erdébil some months ago, has taken refuge in Mazandaran where he is surrounded by a party of about 600 angry men occupying a small fort, from which they have repelled the troops repeatedly sent against them. A body of 3,000 men could finally exterminate these rebels, and evict them from their hideout..…"

600 men facing 3000 soldiers and it is called a hideout in this Turkish-French newspaper.

600 vs 3000 - this isn't a fair fight and this isn't even a fight. The Babis had taken refuge at the Shrine of Shaykh Tabarsi from neighboring villages where Babis had been stoned and without provisions, as refugees. Other Babis heard of them and they gathered to a number near 600 it is said. This occupation was from October 10, 1848 to May 10, 1849. So we are hearing almost live reports as it were but from behind one side of the line certainly. But like the march on Selma you get a very different view of things from the other side of the line. You don't hear about the woman that was among these 600 angry men for example or that they were surrounded on a flat plain open to all - hideout indeed. Or how they managed to hold off the 3000 soldiers.
12 April 1849, Morning Post, London
"From our Correspondent: Constantinople, March 25… Another rebel, who made himself very formidable of late in Mazanderan, has just been taken and put to death. This was a fanatic of the name of Bab, who, at the head of a band of enthusiasts, who are called "Babies," had committed all sorts of atrocities in the south of Persia; and having been driven thence by the troops of the Shah, he betook himself to the north, which he treated much after the same fashion, ravaging and raving(text is alittle unclear) his way all through Mazanderan. By the last accounts, however, it appears that an end had been put to him and his exploits by the hand of the public executioner. There is a striking analogy between the career of General Bab in Mazanderan and that of the General Ben of Transylvania; and it is not unlikely that, like Bab, Ben will come to a bad end." 
23 April London Daily News, p. 5 …
"The following news from Persia appears in the Journal de Constantinople:… Bab, whose revolt and imprisonment at Erdebil I announced to you several months ago, having taken refuge in the Mazanderan, was there with about 600 violent men, who occupied a small fort, from which he had repeatedly repelled the troops sent against him. A corps of 3,000 men, however, has at last exterminated this factious band, and blown up their retreat. … "
(Almost a verbatim quote of the March 29th Journal article from above.)

Now here's the confusion coming in - the Bab was executed by soldiers in July 1850. We have a mistake here about who is being talked about. This was the singled out disciple of the Bab probably - Quddus - who was indeed executed after the Battle at the Shrine of Shaykh Tabarsi. How did the soldiers win?  After failing to conquer them militarily the general of the army promised the Babis if all they wanted was to go live peaceably they could go and swore it on a copy of the Qur'an. The Babis put down their arms and walked out of the "Fort" after months with no provisions and when they surrendered they were executed almost on the spot.
Revue de l'Orient in the April 1849:
"… The Babis, for it is thus they are called, profess the most advanced socialist ideas, so fanatical as one can imagine, they have already taken matters to excess against delegates of authority in Mázindarán. Their chief is in prison in Tauris, and they say they have taken up arms in order to defend him, him and dogmas which he has imposed upon them, and which they accept without a murmur."
The Morning Post, 20 July 1850
"Persia - We are in possession, through our correspondents at Erzeroom and Constantinople, of dates from the capital of the Schah's(sic) dominions to the commencement of June, which report the country as generally quiet, with the sole exception of Tenjaun, where the Babees hold the town, and have gone the length of forming a Nizam. A military expedition has been dispatched against them from Tabreez, from when the constituted authorities have claimed the delivery up, for public execution, of the prophet Bawb, under confinement in the fortress of Tchehrik; but it would seem that his gailers have become proselytes to Babeeism, for they stoutly refuse to give him up. The Bab-el-Bale, or wise beauty of Kazoeen, is a close prisoner at Teheran, where rumour says, she has all but (ital in original-ed) converted some of the influential officers of state, who have been allowed to visit her dungeon."
3 Sept 1850, Morning Chronicle
"We have dates from Tabreez to the 31st July, announcing the important fact that the Sheik ul Islam, of Azerbaidjan (of which extensive district Tabreez is the capital), a very influential personage, as being on of the highest dignitaries of the Church of Persia, has been arrested, and forcibly conveyed to Teheran, by special order of the Emir Nizam, together with his son, under charge of intriguing to secure an extension of power to the clergy, to the manifest detriment of the State.
Babism, notwithstanding the recent execution of its chief and founder Bab, the soi-disant (ed - "supposedly") representative of Mahommed Medhi, the twelfth and last Imam, claiming direct succession from Mahommed, continues to increase, and its followers are said to number in Persia alone 50,000. The village of Zeudjan, which is their stronghold, though only containing a population of 8,000, including women and children, continues to hold out against five regiments of well-disciplined troops, which have closely besieged it for the past three months, and in a late sortie, 200 of the latter were massacred. It is said that the inhabitants have put themselves in a position, as regards provisions and warlike stores, to hold out for at least two years, against even a much superior force."

All from http://bahaikipedia.org/Newspaper_coverage_of_the_Zanjan_Upheaval 

And here from January 1851:
Persia.
The accounts received from this kingdom represent it to have been recently in a disturbed condition. The Shah has attempted to introduce several reforms, but they had not met with general approbation.The Persian sect of Babis, whose main doctrine is said to be the denial of the existence of God, and who recognize no other authority than that of their chief, has at last been extinguished. They had been persecuted for two years, and their Chief, Bab de Shiraf, put to death at Tauris, when they betook themselves to Longrian, which they fortified. The city was stormed by a considerable body of troops under Mehemet Chan, and most of the Babis fell in the struggle. The prisoners were doubtless all killed. They were accused of scandalous offenses against the religion and morals of the country.
The Cheikul-islan, or chief of religion, of Tabris, has been arrested by order of the government, and sent under a strong escort to Teheran; the charge against him was having favored the subversive projects of the Babis. The Khorassan was in full insurrection. Yar Mehemet Khan revolted against his father, the viceroy of the Shah, and besieged him in Herat.
Stryker's American Register and Magazine, James Stryker, E. C. and J. Biddle, January, 1851, p. 129-130

So the Bab was executed in July 1850. It's another whole topic about how execution took place - rather incredible, but a story for another time. The country broke out in some violence but things appeared to calm down. Many leaders of the new religion were also dead or had turned away in the face of so much violence. The Babis that remained active were in disarray - other leaders like Tahirih who still lived were in prison. Many gather to pray about the turn of events and seeds of thoughts of revenge stirred. A few set themselves aside and a few of them gathered in secret and plotted. Out of tens of thousands, maybe over a hundred thousand who had survived, maybe 6 gathered and plotted and of them only three or four made the actual attempt on the Shah's life. Let us recall the times of Christianity that we will see paralleled and even more heinously.

From Tacitus again…
"But all human efforts, all the lavish gifts of the emperor, and the propitiations of the gods, did not banish the sinister belief that the conflagration was the result of an order. Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired. Nero offered his gardens for the spectacle, and was exhibiting a show in the circus, while he mingled with the people in the dress of a charioteer or stood aloft on a car. Hence, even for criminals who deserved extreme and exemplary punishment, there arose a feeling of compassion; for it was not, as it seemed, for the public good, but to glut one man's cruelty, that they were being destroyed.”
So like the fire lit in Rome and turned into something else entirely there is the case of the "attempted" assassination of Naser al-Din Shah Qajar was on August 15, 1852. I say "attempted" because in a few quotes you will see it was not really meant to do so in the words of an eyewitness.

But here is one of the first long accounts, from the London Times, October 23. Note I have cut out sections to not extend the bloody commentary over much – this is less than half of the original text which was published in the newspaper:
The late attempt to assassinate the Shah of Persia was made by two persons who belonged to the religious sect of the Babis. This was the only confession they made in spite of the inexpressible torments of the rack, and, though their bones were crushed by screws, still their lips remained closed, and all they said was, "We are Babis." …. Look at others, whose teeth have been broken out by the hands of the executioner, offering their bare heads to the hammer which is to break their skulls. Or look at the woeful spectacle of the bazaar, lighted up by heretics, whose breasts and shoulders are drilled through and through, and made to contain burning candles. I have seen them marching through the bazaar with a band of music preceding them. … Nor are these the only torments ….  I shall never forget the scene. Not a groan had escaped him;… but the flesh is weaker than the mind - he staggers and falls! For mercy's sake, give him the coup de grace, and make an end of it. … The judges now and then present some Crown officer or dignitary with a few Babis, and the Persian feels delighted and honoured by shedding the blood of the gagged and defenseless man. The infantry, cavalry, artillery, the King's guards, the guilds of the butchers, bakers - all took part in the bloody scenes. A certain Babi was sent as a present to the officers of the garrison; the commanding general had the first cut at him, and the other officers followed, each with his sword, according to rank and seniority. … After their death, the bodies of the Babis are cut into halves, and either nailed to the gates or thrown out to the dogs and shakals."
Now in case you didn't catch the parallel, let me share a few people's comments:

Robert Grant Watson (b. 8 February 1834, d. 28 October 1892)
In 1866 British career diplomat Robert Grant Watson published a history the first half of the 19th century of Persia and included 16 pages on the events related to the history of the Babi Faith. Watson makes the very point himself about the parallels. He says of the Babi Faith:
"Bábism, though at present a proscribed religion in Persia, is far from being extinct, or even declining, and the Báb may yet contest with Mahomed the privilege of being regarded as the real prophet of the faithful. Bábism in its infancy was the cause of a greater sensation than that even which was produced by the teaching of Jesus, if we may judge from the account of Josephus of the first days of Christianity. Far from foreseeing the future spread of that religion, the Jewish historian contents himself with observing — "And the tribe of Christians, so named from him (Christ), are not extinct at this day."
This is at the footnote at this url - http://archive.org/stream/ahistorypersiaf00grangoog#page/n363/mode/2up

Stephen Greenleaf Bulfinch (b. June 18, 1809 -  d. October 12, 1870)
Studies in the evidences of Christianity (1869) pp. 129 – 140, comments on Babi history. Bulfinch had been a Unitarian minister since 1830 but circa 1860 he accepted the trinity doctrine. He makes comparisons between the Bab and Jesus in various ways saying in part:
In various respects, the history of Mirza Ali Mohammed, surnamed the Bab, presents startling resemblance to that of the Savior. Claiming descent from an ancient prophet king, he was yet, like Jesus, born in a lowly station; still he was regarded by his followers as the sovereign of his nation and of mankind, whose advent had been long foretold and ardently expected. After leading a life of purity, and uttering words of wisdom, he was put to death, through the hostility of his own government, but by the hands of foreign soldiers; and, before his execution, he was denied by some of his most prominent followers; nay, the very form of contumely with which thy were compelled to treat him, was the same which had been used towards the Savior in the hall of the high priest.
It is high honor for a teacher of wisdom thus to bear in his own history a resemblance to that of the Redeemer and we would fain believe that Mirza Ali Mohammed was worthy of the distinction. But we cannot forget that the claim was made for him, that he was "the Gate of Truth, the Imam of Islam," the subject of ancient prophecy, the worker of present miracles, and the destined possessor of universal empire.…"
He then elaborates that the Bab was deluded but not consciously an impostor, but of pure character. - footnote 36 for the quote is at http://archive.org/stream/cu31924031235546#page/n142/mode/1up

Here's one comment from 1874:
Sacramento Daily Union of 14 February 1874 , p. 4, 4th col - "He (the Shah) then massacred the Babis and religious sects, and set fire, a la Nero, to some of his victims.”- http://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=SDU18740214.2.34
Here's one from 1885 by Mary Wilson - she published an article in the periodical Contemporary Review and included in it comments of scholar Gobineau:
”…a joyful constancy in the face of bitterest suffering, torture and death, as vivid and touching as any that are found in the records of the heroic days of old”… We have been accustomed to claim it as an argument for the truth of our Christianity that its believers have been strong to suffer martyrdom for its sake. But here we have not men only, but tender and delicate women and little children, joyfully enduring torture "not accepting deliverance," for the sake of the faith that was in them.…The account of this closing day in the Bab’s history almost irresistibly recalls a similar day in a more sacred story. The mock trial – the outburst of blind, popular fury, stirred up by a jealous and vindictive priesthood – the cruel mockings and insult …"
- http://books.google.com/books?id=aJPQAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA808 
Now I said before that this wasn't much of an "attack". Here's the eyewitness report. In 1865 polish doctor Jakob Polak published his first hand account of on the attempt on the life of the Shah in Das Land und seine Bewohner. It mentions(translated from the German):
"In late summer 1852 as the Shah, accompanied by an approximately 500-man guard, underwent an outing from his summer palace Riaveran, three men came towards him, whereupon one of them point blank fired a pistol at him, ... The shot grazed the stomach of the Shah's horse; the guard appeared to back off, leaving him to his fate, then everyone believed him to be dead and murdered at the hands of a pretender to the throne. Had there been a decaying corpse among the living it would have seemed superfluous [very loosely translated]. Only one foreign servant noticed the Shah stirring. He lunged dauntlessly and seized one of the murderers. A fight arose in which the servant received a stab wound to the stomach; in the meantime others trudged towards the murderers - and the king was saved. What resulted were only a few small grains of shot in the area of his backside. Of the assassins one recognized fanatical Babis, who wanted to avenge the death of their Prophet. The pistol and the ammunition which they operated were so poor that only a miracle could have enabled them to realize their goal. The Shah immediately showed himself the wolf, in order to prevent malicious rumours... . He retorted that God had saved him: "Certainly God has saved me, because you all have forsaken me.”
For much more on the who and what of these attempted "assassins" go listen to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3Xl9py3z5w (which was also published in a journal - "Millennialism and Violence: The Attempted Assassination of Nasir al-Din Shah of Iran by the Babis in 1852". Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions 12 (1): 57–82. doi: 10.1525/nr.2008.12.1.57. JSTOR  10.1525/nr.2008.12.1.57.

Continuing from the polish doctor:
Then began the persecution. The Shah was encouraged to believe in a further widely networked conspiracy of Babis, shut up behind regiments, civil servants, attendants, priests, teachers, garden, in every sigh he found plotters and he was not for a moment without fear for his life. Even the wife of the grand vizier, born in Masandaran, was accused belonging to the sect [...]. Seized by fear and horror from every side the Shah lapsed into Machiavellian ways to exterminate the believers. … seek out all Babis and throw them in to jail. Then he ordered every corps, ever branch of the civilian and military detail to surrender at least one Babi in case within one or the other corps were still secret members of the sect … [... passage about torture]. The martyrs demonstrated the courage and steadfastness of fanaticism; no recanting of faith, no hint of a cry of pain."
- original in German at http://books.google.com/books?id=lyFDAAAAcAAJ&jtp=350
- a translation at http://www.paintdrawer.co.uk/david/folders/Research/Bahai/Tahirih/Martyrdom%20of%20Tahirih%20(Dr%20Jakob%20Eduard%20Polak).htm

Alas the tale is not ended. Not ended by half. A mass execution of Babis began. Exactly how big is debated. In The Babi and Baha’i community of Iran: a case of “suspended genocide”?, by Moojan Momen, Journal of Genocide Research (2005), 7(2), June, especially page 222   - there Momen mentions:
"Conservative estimates put the total number of Babis killed during the whole period of 1848 to 1853 at 3,000, while other historians, including the Iranian court chronicler Sipihr and the Baha’i leader ‘Abdu’l-Baha (1844–1921), claim 20,000 or more. The main reason for the indecisiveness about the numbers killed relates to the events after the attempted assassination of Nasir ad-Din Shah. While many only give a list of 35 men officially executed in Tehran and a small number elsewhere, there are some accounts… that seem to imply a much larger number of deaths…”
This is what was known in 2005 - that scholars had found evidence of "only" 3,000 people. But Baha'is had long claimed 20,000 or more; just that the names of all were not recorded. What was unknown at the time was these very newspaper clippings I'm presenting now.

First there are reports of hundreds:
"Des Nouvelles de Perse", 3rd column, half way down in , Journal des débats politiques et littéraires, 30 Oct 1852, page 1 (translated from French)"Letters of Tauris September 27, arrived yesterday from Trebizond, the city brought news of Persia, who are of a certain gravity….The execution in Tehran about four hundred Babis, said to be complicit in the attack against the Shah of Persia, which we reported in our preceding numbers; took place with a great camera. They were subjected to the greatest tortures. This ensures that the Shah of Persia is seriously affected as a result of the attack directed against him by the Babis."
By December the reports are taking far larger tones:
20 December 1852, London Standard, p. 3:
"…Letters from Bagdad of the 7th ult. are of importance. The Shah's brother, accused of being a Bab, had escaped from Teheran, and had sought refuge at Bagdad. The Turkish Governor, Namik Pacha, had refused to receive him, which is contrary to the sentiments shown by the Government towards refugees. The Persia prince, however, entered the city with a British passport, and, disguised as a British officer, took up his quarters at Colonel Rawlinson's, our consul general, who acted with great humanity and friendship towards the unfortunate young man. By the same letters we learn that the persecution against the Babs was awful, and the 20,000 or 30,000 had been put to death in the south of Persia."
Further discussion about 20,000 martyrs see https://senmcglinn.wordpress.com/email-archive/20000-martyrs/

This has been a harrowing review. You may get some grasp of the intensity of spiritual commitment Baha'is have when they engage in projects and prayers trying to make the world better. Perhaps our pleas for spiritual virtues like peace, race unity, equality of the sexes may seem like disconnected abstractions to some but, let us say, we have paid for these ideals greatly. Very greatly. And I ask you - is this a reasonable parallel to the suffering of Jesus and the early Christians and how they suffered?

O - and remember that earthquake after Jesus?

Consider these:
The Times-Picayune (New Orleans, Louisiana)5 May 1853, Thu • Thursday's Evening Edition
Earthquake at Washington A slight shock of an earthquake was felt in Washington yesterday.
The Sun(Baltimore, Maryland)6 May 1853, Fri • Page 1
Earthquakes and meteors are the order of the day; but neither of these phenomena have honored Baltimore with any demonstrations lately, though we hear of them in many quarters over the country. In addition to the earthquake which was on Monday felt at Washington, and so sensibly and alarmingly at Wheeling and other points,…
Evening Star(Washington, District of Columbia)11 Jul 1853, Mon • First Edition
"Smyrna June 15 - The city of Shiraz, in Persia, was totally destroyed by an earthquake in the night of the 1st of May.Erzeroum, June 3 - We have news of an extraordinary earthquake in Persia which killed 12,000 persons during one night. A plague had arisen from their unburied corpses."
Devestating. Indeed. But now here's the interesting thing:

Year-book of Facts in Science and Art by Charles Robert Cross, etc., published 1854, p. 328

"A terrible earthquake destroyed the city of Shiraz, Persia, on the 3d of May, 15,000 perishing in the ruins. This earthquake dried up the river Zsianderwood, upon which the town of Ispahan depended for its supply of water. This calamity was followed by a flight of locusts, which, in a few hours, destroyed vegetation; and following these, was an inundation which did great damage; - and with all this, the cholera morbus set in at Teheran, carrying off 150 persons daily. On the 2d of May, shocks of earthquake were felt at Washington City, on the Potomac; Lynchburg, Va., on the James River; Wheeling, Va., on the Ohio River, and at Zanesville, Ohio, on the banks of the Muskingum River. The difference in longitude is about equal to the difference in clock-time between Shiraz and Washington."
Now I leave it to you - what indeed hath God wrought?

And what does the picture of meteors over the Mississippi have to do with it? Well that will be another note… the theme is so vast it requires more than one review. And - these meteor showers stopped people in the tracks.

For another approach to the goings on in the period see Thief in the Night or The Strange Case of the Missing Millennium by William Sears